Thursday, March 14, 2013

Draft Action Research Project Progress Report

-->
Week 3 Assignment, Part 3
Draft Action Research Project Progress Report

a.            Title – Increasing Parental Involvement will Increase Student Achievement on State Tests and in Our Classrooms
b.            Needs Assessment
The goal of my action research project is to increase special education and socio-economically disadvantaged students’ state assessment results and classroom performances by increasing parental involvement on campus. For the past two consecutive years, our campus has not met Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in these demographic areas. We have approximately 839 students on our campus with 107 of these students being classified as special education. Student information and data was collected from many sources, including previous TAKS and/or STAAR test results, including TAKS Accommodated and Modified, information from our Student Review Level (SLR), and DMAC.
c.            Objectives and Vision of the action research project
In order to reach the goal of my action research plan, I first had to organize an action research team to share a common goal and discuss plans of further action. The objective of the project is to find out if parents being more involved in their child’s education will have an adverse effect on their test scores and class grades. The measurable objectives will simply be the number of guardian and parent participants, progress and report card grades during each marking period, and comparison of 2012 and 2013 state assessment results. Parents will be invited onto our campus and into our classrooms to actually have the opportunity to work with their kids. Hopefully, by having parents and guardians showing interest in their children at school, the students will apply themselves more and will experience more success in life.
d.            Review of the Literature and Action Research Strategy
After serving on our Campus Improvement Team, I was shocked at the lack of parental support and participation around our campus.  In today’s world, our kids need parent support at home and school. According to Dorothy Rich, “In this complex world, it takes more than a good school to educate children. And it takes more than a good home. It takes these two major educational institutions working together” (Parent Involvement in Education 2008). Students with a good support team of parents and other family members tend to perform better academically in school. These students tend to set realistic and achievable academic goals for themselves. There are many ways parents and guardians can be involved in the school system. Some of the types of parenting include: “parents as recipients and supports, parents as educators and learners, parents as non-instructional volunteers, parents as instructional volunteers, and parents as decision makers” (Khan 60). One of the biggest issues in education today is a lack of parental support for students, teachers, and administrators. According to the research from The Center for Public Education, “effective parent involvement comes when a true partnership exists between schools and families” (Back to school: How parents involvement affects student achievement 2011).
e.            Articulate the Vision
            After creating an Action Research Parental Involvement Team, I introduced my action research plan to the Campus Improvement Team, District Improvement Team, and our current staff by presenting the groups with a power point presentation displaying our AEIS data and current situation with AYP. I pointed out that our special education population and socio-economic disadvantaged state assessment results and failure analysis from the 2011-2012 school year were considerably lower than the other populations. Communication and updates on progress of our plan were updated on my blog.
f.     Manage the organization
 The Parental Involvement Action Research Team that was established consisted of my site-mentor, special education teachers, diagnosticians, paraprofessionals, and myself. We were all trained on parental involvement in education during a staff development session presented to our campus by our local education center. I took all the responsibility of compiling a list of special education and at-risk students to observe and monitor throughout the school year. The research team took the responsibility of calling parents and guardians to set up observation and participation visits on campus. I tracked individual students’ report card grades from each marking period and state assessment results for comparision. Ultimately, we want to make student learning a top priority and goal for our plan.
g.    Manage Operations
Consensus building among the research team was a challenge. Not every participating member on the team was in agreeance that parent involvement was the issue. My strategy was to show the team our needs assessment data on parental involvement from our Campus Improvement Team. This allowed the group to be able to see our current lack of parent participation on campus. The team met bi-monthly to communicate progress and discuss any changes that need to take place. We used the Force Field Task Analysis to weigh the positives and negatives of this new plan.
h.    Respond to Community Interest and Needs
Having missed AYP for two consecutive years due to our low scores in socio-economic disadvantaged and special education sub-populations, my action research plan is targeted to reach these groups. By using parental involvement as an instructional strategy and intervention, students’ can experience success in school. The completion of this action research plan will benefit many people including: the school, teachers, administrators, and community stakeholders.
References
Dervarics, Chuck and O’Brien, Eileen. (2011). Back to school:how parent involvement affects student achievement. Alexandria, VA: The Center for Public Education. Retrieved from http://www.centerforpubliceducation.org.
Khan, Mir Baiz. (1996). Parental Involvement in Education: Possibilities and limitations. The School Community Journal, 6(1), 57-68. Retrieved from http://www.adi.org/journal/ss96/KhanSpring1996.pdf.
Parent Involvement in Education. (2008, June). School Days. Retrieved from         http://www.surfnetparents.com.



Thursday, September 27, 2012

Action Research Report

My action research project is to increase parental involvement on our campus with our special education students, which will hopefully also increase their effort on their classroom work and improve state test scores. During the first week of school, a parental involvement action research team was established. This team consisted of nine members, including special education teachers, paraprofessionals, diagnosticians, and administration members. We have set meeting dates occurring every second and fourth Tuesday of each month. During our first team meeting, we all discussed, worked on, and agreed upon a common goal for the group. Our paraprofessionals and other staff members that could or will work directly with our parents/guardians were trained before and during staff development on some of the techniques to use when working with parents. During the second meeting, we identified a list of students for our program. We chose a varied of special education students, including mainstream, those in the inclusion setting, and resource setting. All through September, the team compiled a call list of names and phone numbers for these students. Parent information was gathered from the students, View Student Information (VSI), and Skyward. We are currently in the process of calling and inviting parents to come spend half or an entire day in the Content Mastery Center where they can actually work with their kids and see what happens day to day at school. We are hoping to find that getting parents involved in their child’s education, not just for extracurricular events, will have a positive impact on classroom work, grades, and state assessment results.

Monday, September 24, 2012

Web Conference Reflection

I think that the web conferences are great! However, I was unable to attend any of the conferences during the EDLD 5326 School Community Relations class.  I did find that being able to view and listen to the recordings of the conferences was very beneficial to me. I felt better knowing that all of my questions regarding the reflections, logs, and assignments  were also questions of my classmates. Another big help during this course for me was the “Facebook” page. I appreciate whoever runs and updates that page.

Saturday, August 4, 2012

Action Research Plan

"Parental Involvement"

GOAL:  Increase parental involvement on campus with our special education students, which will also increase their effort on their classroom work and improve state test scores.

OUTCOMES
ACTIVITIES
RESOURCES/ RESEARCH TOOLS NEEDED
RESPONSIBILITY TO ADDRESS ACTIVITIES
TIME LINE
Benchmarks/
ASSESSMENT
Revisions to SIP/PIP based on monitoring and assessments
Establish a Parental Involvement Action Research Team  

Compile team consisting of site-mentor, Sp. Ed. teachers and paraprofessionals, diagnosticians, and myself (CM Teacher)
Comments and input about the team from the Administrators and site-supervisor
Self, site-supervisor, Administration Team
August 2012
Bi-monthly meetings
Team staff members subject to change based on Administration decisions and input
Research Team to share a common goal
Share the “Parental Involvement” goal with the research team; discuss ideas and plan of action for the 2012-2013 school year
Comments and input about the team from the Administrators and site-supervisor
Self, site-supervisor, Administration Team
August 2012
Review goal at start of each bi-monthly meeting
Ideas and activities subject to change based on decisions from Research Team
Train paraprofessionals and other staff working directly with parents/guardians
Staff Development class
Staff Development class on “Parental Involvement”
Self, site-supervisor;              J. Mitchell/L. Coble (“Parental Involvement” presenters)
August 2012
Consult with paraprofessionals and staff in bi-monthly meetings
Use additional resources and websites for training
Identify a list of students for the program.
Team will chose a wide variety of students, including students that are mainstream and in the inclusion and resource setting.

List of Special Education and At-Risk  students
Research Team
August 2012-September 2012
Meet with Counselors and diagnosticians to check list
none
Create a call list

Team composes list consisting of student names, parents/guardians, and phone numbers

View Student Information (VSI); Skyward (gradebook)
Self; Sp.Ed. paraprofessionals
August 2012-September 2012
Meet with Research Team to double check lists
none
Call parents
Call and invite parents up to campus; parents invited in 2-3 week group intervals
Call List created by Research Team
Self; Sp.Ed. paraprofessionals
September 2012-end of first semester
Meet with Research Team bi-monthly to make sure all parents have been contacted
See if any parents prefer to be contacted by email or text messages
Track students’ grades and classroom performance
Check  and monitor progress report and report card grades during each marking period
Coordination of Services, progress and  report card grades, CM Analysis Reports
Self
October 2012-January 2013
Meet with Research Team to discuss individual students’ attitudes and morale with school
Compare results with number of parent participants
Chart students classroom grades and 2012 state test results
Chart students grades and scores in a graph
Marking period grades; TAKS & STAAR results for 2012 & 2013
Research Team
January 2013-June 2013
Meet with Research Team to compare TAKS & STAAR results from 2012 to 2013; compare class scores from first of school year to the end
none
Find trends in the results of visited parents’ students vs. non-visited parents’ students
Discuss with the Research Team about the progress or regression students have shown from the plan during the 1st Semester
Charted classroom grades from each marking period and test results
Research Team
February 2013-June 2013
Meet with Research Team to discuss improvements or declines in grades and scores.
Find other possible solutions to help students that have not shown any improvements
Find out what the parents think
Interview participating parents about pros and cons of the program
Participate in annual ARD meetings to interview parents
Self, Diagnosticians, Sp. Ed. Teachers
March 2013-May 2013
Meet with Research Team to review and compare parents/guardians answers
Discuss how we can improve the cons of the program
Evaluate the program
Reflect on what worked; how can we change what didn’t work?
Collected data through the 2012-2013 school year
Research Team
June 2013
Discuss if the program was a success in being beneficial for student achievement
How can we improve?